IS IT BAD TO BEAT NLC BACK TO LIFE? – Written by Omole Ibukun

Before you assume this article is about to mock the beating of the president of the Nigerian Labour Congress by the Police accompanied by thugs led by Mr. Chinasa Nwaneri (the Special Assistant to the Governor of Imo state on Special Duties), Tapey and Madoka, ask yourself one question: If the NLC president could get beaten and abducted for protesting (protesting is literally his job), should the rest of us expect basic human rights and civil liberties again? I can only imagine how much beating he must have gone through for his right eye to be completely shut from the torture. Seeing the video made by the union president after that brutal torture by Police and Thugs of the Imo state governor, Hope Uzodimma, made me very afraid.

It made me afraid for the Nigerian government and ruling class, who is attacking all of their gatekeepers to hold on to power, because they risk a bloody uprising of the people trying to justifiably defend themselves from economic and physical attacks. The Nigerian ruling class is a real house of commotion and we are about to break the gates down as the gatekeepers get betrayed. That uprising will not be held back by any gates, and at the risk of sounding soft I PITY THESE OPPRESSORS! A lot of us seriously wish that a bloodless critical awareness revolution can happen in Nigeria instead of a bloody revolution, but it is said that those who make peaceful resolution impossible make violent revolutionary inevitable. The same gatekeepers that have helped them to keep us down are now being attacked by them, but it’s not that simple.

We must say something loud and clear, no matter the mixed feelings we have about Joe Ajaero and the NLC. Any Nigerian has the right to participate in any protest in Nigeria as long as they are a citizen of this country, no matter the pure or ulterior motive behind the protest. Protest can never be a crime, no matter the time or intention, whether it is few weeks to an election or during an election. During the 2019 elections, NYSC Corp members on election duties downed tools and protested nonpayment of allowances in some parts of the country. So election period is not too sacred for protests.

The only major difference between the civilian dictatorship that we experience presently in Nigeria and the past brutal military regimes is the fact that the freedom to associate and protest is now very legal and preserved in the constitution, so there should be no debate about that. Those justifying the attacks on the NLC president based on the intention of the protest are morally bankrupt morons with some conscious or subconscious ties with the Tinubu regime and what the regime represents. The intention of a protest is no justification for an attack on the protesters. If you don’t like the protest, stage your own!

Those justifying the attack on the basis that Joe Ajaero is from Imo state and that he is not supposed to meddle into politics as a labor leader and an automatic Labour Party member are also very wrong. Labour Parties exist all over the world. In the case of Nigeria, it is sad that rank-and-file workers are no longer in charge of their party, but their right to have a political party and a political interest remains sacrosanct. Those justifying the attack on the basis that Joe Ajaero might be using the protest to mobilize for a candidate in the election or for a future governorship ambition in Imo – his home state, are also very wrong. Workers and their leaders have the right to have a candidate in an election while protesting the policies of the present administration simultaneously. If the unions were democratic, workers will democratically choose those who represent their welfare interests.

If it was for a future ambition, there is nothing wrong in having that ambition. APC became a national party through the force of protests by the working people. Electoral efforts and protests are not mutually exclusive and we must shout that at the rooftops. The Tinubu regime is trying to make protests about electoral issues illegal. The first thing the APC did after the rigged election earlier in the year was to ask people not to protest but go to court. Activists can be radical politicians and vice versa.

As a non-political kid in Ilesa back in the 2008 – 2010 period, I playfully joined rallies of the then-ACN to restore the electoral mandate of Aregbesola in Osun State, which became the first state won by the Tinubu tendency outside of Lagos. Oshiomole rode on his reputation as a worker’s leader to win governorship in Edo and that would have been a great thing if he had executed and defended pro-workers policies as governor. So political ambition for a worker’s leader is not bad in itself. What can be bad is the goal of that ambition and the method with which that ambition is conducted? In the case of Oshiomole, the goal was to become APC’s National Chairman and therefore his method was to win governorship and later cross-carpet to the ruling party. That method was anti-people because he only used the people for his personal interests.

Now let’s have the frank talk. The beating of the NLC president, Joe Ajaero, for organizing a protest in a so-called democratic regime is not something to joke about. It’s something that calls for a sober reflection. A sober reflection on the methods of the NLC and the trade union movement over the years. The method with which the protest was called and the method with which NLC had been calling and calling off protests for a while now, is very erratic.

Not only did the labor leaders imbibe the habit of calling and calling off action undemocratically, they have also built the unions into an undemocratic structure where no one calls congresses of the members. Most unions affiliated to the NLC are dominated by mini-dictators, except maybe for ASUU. The NLC did not only call off the September 2020 action against fuel price and electricity tariff increment, but they took a complicitly silent position on #EndSARS until the protest ended in a massacre of innocent young protesters. The latest protest against subsidy removal and fuel price increment was called off after less than a day and since then NLC have only been issuing empty threats while the working people of Nigeria suffer these increments everyday. The working people have constantly felt betrayed by NLC. Over the years till now, it’s been all threats but no proactive action. This is understandably why there is a sentiment by the working people to justify or mock this beating of the NLC president by the police and those thugs.

Asides the fact that NLC has disappointed many Nigerians over and over again, another method of the NLC is to restrict themselves to using their National might to fight in states over issues that have a national spread. Before now, most of the workers would allege that their state leaders are complicit with whichever state government is maltreating them, and that’s why the NLC is not taking up those issues in their own state – but can issues like nonpayment of salaries not be taken up nationally as a matter of solidarity? For example, this same non payment of workers salaries that is already a menace in Imo state is present in almost every state of the country.

In the last administration, rather than tackling the failure of all the Ministries of the Buhari Government and the Buhari regime itself, they singled out Ngige (a dangerous wicked man) rather than tackle the whole government together as one unit. I think this is partly because NLC fears that they have too many political interests within their own structure that they might not be able to confront the whole of the Nigerian ruling capitalist class, especially when all they rely on for their actions are those leadership structures. This is because their membership are largely disconnected because they are never consulted by the leaders who just issue directives. This history of selective activism of the NLC is why many people rushed to justify that beating.

The NLC has become so irresponsible that workers no longer respond to their empty threats when they call for warning sit-at-home strikes. In that last sit-at-home strike, they had to beat workers in Ondo for not complying with the sit-at-home directives. Maybe this beating of the NLC president is Karma for that, maybe not. One thing I’m sure of is that the beating is a wake up call for NLC to build a proactive and democratic labor movement for the working people across the country. It is a wake up call for the labor movement to start confronting the Tinubu regime on fuel subsidy removal, electricity tariff increment, naira floating, non payment of salaries and allowances, nonpayment of pensions, demolitions of the homes of the working poor, etc.

While reading the outcry of the masses against the 160 billion naira SUVs by the National Assembly, I remembered that I once worked in the NLC headquarters building and I witnessed the ‘carcade’ of Labour leaders in the NLC and the expensive official rides of the Labour leaders. This is not to say that they should not condemn it or protest it, but to ask them to go and wash their hands clean from the corruption and inequality of this system first so that they can come to equity with clean hands. This is to say that the NLC and other labor leaders have become to hard to distinguish from the ruling class themselves. They also issue DIRECTIVES to the working people just like the ruling class do to workers in public service, so where is the distinction? How won’t we understand those who no longer know the difference between the NLC president and the governor? How won’t we understand those who think this is ruling class infighting?

Let me cite an example of proactive unionism here. Earlier in the week, EFCC stormed a student community in OAU in the middle of the night. 69 suspected internet fraudsters were arrested after being slapped and shoved around by EFCC Officials at Oduduwa estate. The next day, the union leadership mobilized three Coaster buses and three Hummer buses of students to the EFCC office in Ibadan and staged a protest until a huge number of the students picked were released because the EFCC had no basis to hold them. Within 24 hours of the protest, the EFCC Chairman announced an end to midnight sting operations by the EFCC. I remember that there were labor leaders who joined in calling #EndSARS protesters internet fraudsters even when SARS and the Nigerian Police were brutalizing all of us. People have died, workers have become homeless and the masses have become hopeless because of the evil policies of this government but the NLC has justified some of the anti-people policies of the government causing this despair and blamed the people. Now the table has turned!

Genuinely, I have very mixed feelings about the beating like most Nigerians and I have only tried to sort out those feelings by writing this. It’s not that I have answers for everyone on this complex situation. But I know that the trade union movement is our baby. If our baby has lost consciousness and our oppressors decide to help us beat our baby back to consciousness out of deep-seated hatred for us and our baby, should we not be happy for the gift of life? Does the pleasure of life not overrule the pain of beating on the baby, especially when we are equipped and poised to ensure we address the diseases that made our baby lose consciousness in the first instance? While I send my solidarity fist to those rank-and-file workers fighting for their wages and got hurt at Imo, does the pleasure of a looming NLC protest on November 8 over this beating and other issues not override the pain of the beating of NLC President, Joe Ajaero? Can we try to see the silver lining here? I’m just asking though.

Omole Ibukun writes from Abuja and can be contacted on 09167636201

Leave a Reply