In recent developments, the decision to honor the least effective chairman with an award of excellence has sparked outrage among the residents of Gwagwalada. This controversial choice is seen as a betrayal of the community’s ongoing efforts to improve the region.

Gwagwalada residents argue that such recognition not only undermines the dedication of those striving for a better Gwagwalada but also reflects poorly on the integrity of the selection process. The award, which many view as being granted for insufficient merit, is perceived as a disservice to the genuine progress and hard work of the community.

Furthermore, there are concerns that this situation highlights a broader issue of political education and engagement among the youth. The perception that some student leaders may lack a fundamental understanding of political responsibility and patriotism only compounds the frustration. The award decision, therefore, is not just about the individual honored but also about the message it sends regarding leadership values and community dedication.

In essence, the decision to present an award to an underperforming chairman for minimal gains is seen by many as a “show of shame,” motivated by superficial incentives rather than genuine achievement. This incident raises important questions about how leadership excellence is recognized and what it means for the future of Gwagwalada’s political and social landscape.